Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 33(4): 1821-1843, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317630

ABSTRACT

We sought to estimate the impact of temporary financial assistance (TFA) for housing-related expenses from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs on costs for a variety of health care services. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Veterans who entered the Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) program between 10/2015 and 9/2018. We assessed the effect of TFA on health care costs using a multivariable difference-in-difference approach. Outcomes were direct medical costs of health care encounters (i.e., emergency department, outpatient mental health, inpatient mental health, outpatient substance use disorder treatment, and residential behavioral health) in the VA system. Temporary financial assistance was associated with a decrease in ED (-$11, p<.003), outpatient mental health (-$28, p<.001), outpatient substance use disorder treatment (-$25, p<.001), inpatient mental health (-$258, p<.001), and residential behavioral health (-$181, p<.001) costs per quarter for Veterans in the rapid re-housing component of SSVF. These results can inform policy debates regarding proper solutions to housing instability.


Subject(s)
Housing Instability , Ill-Housed Persons , Public Housing , Veterans , Humans , Health Care Costs , Health Expenditures , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Housing , Retrospective Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
3.
Nat Med ; 27(12): 2120-2126, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1493152

ABSTRACT

The role that traditional and hybrid in-person schooling modes contribute to the community incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections relative to fully remote schooling is unknown. We conducted an event study using a retrospective nationwide cohort evaluating the effect of school mode on SARS-CoV-2 cases during the 12 weeks after school opening (July-September 2020, before the Delta variant was predominant), stratified by US Census region. After controlling for case rate trends before school start, state-level mitigation measures and community activity level, SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates were not statistically different in counties with in-person learning versus remote school modes in most regions of the United States. In the South, there was a significant and sustained increase in cases per week among counties that opened in a hybrid or traditional mode versus remote, with weekly effects ranging from 9.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.7-16.1) to 21.3 (95% CI = 9.9-32.7) additional cases per 100,000 persons, driven by increasing cases among 0-9 year olds and adults. Schools can reopen for in-person learning without substantially increasing community case rates of SARS-CoV-2; however, the impacts are variable. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the underlying reasons for the observed regional differences more fully.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Schools/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/transmission , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Teaching , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL